MISRA Discussion Forums

Full Version: 6.5 Expressions (C++)
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

6.5 Expressions (C++)

Threads

  1. Why example in Rule 5-0-13 is non-compliant (1 Reply)
  2. M5-0-15 + range-based for loops (3 Replies)
  3. Rule 5-0-6 about underlying type of boolean bit field (1 Reply)
  4. 5-2-10 with non-arithmetic operators (0 Replies)
  5. 5-2-12 - Does the rule apply for braced-init-list arg to initializer_list parameter? (1 Reply)
  6. Essential types of constant variables (2 Replies)
  7. Underlying type's implicit conversion of the shift operators (1 Reply)
  8. Clarification for Rule 5-2-4 (1 Reply)
  9. Clarification for 5-0-20 (operands to a binary bitwise operator) (1 Reply)
  10. 5-0-3: Meaning of "implicitly converted to a different underlying type" (1 Reply)
  11. About Rule 5-0-15 and the size of the array (1 Reply)
  12. Rule 5-2-6 and dynamicaly loading (.dll / .so) (3 Replies)
  13. 5-2-7 and void pointer conversions (1 Reply)
  14. For rule 5-2-12: replace "variable" with "value"? (5 Replies)
  15. 5-2-2: why only virtual base class??? (1 Reply)
  16. Underlying type balancing for integral operands (3 Replies)
  17. Rule 5-0-19: array of pointer, instead of, pointer to array (3 Replies)
  18. 5-2-3 possibly flawed (1 Reply)
  19. Underlying type of sum of constants (2 Replies)
  20. 5-0-4 false positive? (1 Reply)
  21. Constant expressions and cvalues (1 Reply)
  22. Clarification for underlying type of an integer constant expression (3 Replies)
  23. Rule 5-0-3 false positive warning (1 Reply)
  24. 5-2-7 reinterpret_cast between derived classes? (3 Replies)
  25. Rule 5-0-19 are references also considered a 'pointer indirection'? (1 Reply)
  26. Rules 6-5-1 to 6-5-6 (1 Reply)
  27. Rule 5-2-7 (1 Reply)
  28. Rule 5-0-12 (2 Replies)
  29. Clarification for 6-5-1 (1 Reply)
  30. Rule 5-3-1 and bool & ... (2 Replies)
  31. Doubts on underlying type of integer constant expressions. (1 Reply)