6.5 Expressions (C++)
Threads
- M5-0-20 clarification (1 Reply)
- 5-2-10 with non-arithmetic operators (1 Reply)
- Why example in Rule 5-0-13 is non-compliant (1 Reply)
- M5-0-15 + range-based for loops (3 Replies)
- Rule 5-0-6 about underlying type of boolean bit field (1 Reply)
- 5-2-12 - Does the rule apply for braced-init-list arg to initializer_list parameter? (1 Reply)
- Essential types of constant variables (2 Replies)
- Underlying type's implicit conversion of the shift operators (1 Reply)
- Clarification for Rule 5-2-4 (1 Reply)
- Clarification for 5-0-20 (operands to a binary bitwise operator) (1 Reply)
- 5-0-3: Meaning of "implicitly converted to a different underlying type" (1 Reply)
- About Rule 5-0-15 and the size of the array (1 Reply)
- Rule 5-2-6 and dynamicaly loading (.dll / .so) (3 Replies)
- 5-2-7 and void pointer conversions (1 Reply)
- For rule 5-2-12: replace "variable" with "value"? (5 Replies)
- 5-2-2: why only virtual base class??? (1 Reply)
- Underlying type balancing for integral operands (3 Replies)
- Rule 5-0-19: array of pointer, instead of, pointer to array (3 Replies)
- 5-2-3 possibly flawed (1 Reply)
- Underlying type of sum of constants (2 Replies)
- 5-0-4 false positive? (1 Reply)
- Constant expressions and cvalues (1 Reply)
- Clarification for underlying type of an integer constant expression (3 Replies)
- Rule 5-0-3 false positive warning (1 Reply)
- 5-2-7 reinterpret_cast between derived classes? (3 Replies)
- Rule 5-0-19 are references also considered a 'pointer indirection'? (1 Reply)
- Rules 6-5-1 to 6-5-6 (1 Reply)
- Rule 5-2-7 (1 Reply)
- Rule 5-0-12 (2 Replies)
- Clarification for 6-5-1 (1 Reply)
- Rule 5-3-1 and bool & ... (2 Replies)
- Doubts on underlying type of integer constant expressions. (1 Reply)