MISRA Discussion Forums

MISRA Discussion Forums > MISRA C > MISRA C:2012 and MISRA C:2023 guidelines > 7.2 Compilation and build > 2.4 violation?
Full Version: 2.4 violation?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

gs

28-01-2014, 05:54 PM
Does the following example violate rule #2.4:
Code:
typedef enum A {
    b
} A;

A c() {
    return b;
}

misra-c

10-02-2014, 02:09 PM
Your example does violate rule 2.4, providing typedef “A” is always used in the rest of the translation unit and never “enum A”. A compliant typedef declaration could be written as
Code:
typedef enum {
        b
     } A;
This issue is similar to the example of record_t in the Example section for rule 2.4.
MISRA Discussion Forums > MISRA C > MISRA C:2012 and MISRA C:2023 guidelines > 7.2 Compilation and build > 2.4 violation?