MISRA Discussion Forums

Hello,

Rule 7.0.2 has an exception for converting pointer to bool, and requires an explicit operator bool() for classes. But what if a class, let's say a wrapper class for strings, provides an operator const char *? Consider the following example:

Code:
class C

{

public:

    operator const char *() const;

};

void f(C c)

{

    if (c); // C is converted twice: C -> const char * -> bool

}

Shall the commented line be considered compliant with this rule (because each of the conversion steps by itself is compliant), or not (because as a whole it is the conversion of a class to bool without using an explicit operator bool)?

The later, it should be treated as non-compliant. In effect you've got an object of type C being converted to bool, even if it does go through extra steps.

if (c.operator()) ;
or
if ( c ); // if C declared operator bool();
would both be compliant.

Alright, thank you very much for the clarification.

karos

misra cpp

karos