MISRA Discussion Forums

MISRA Discussion Forums > MISRA C > MISRA-C: 2004 rules > 6.8 Declarations and Definitions > 8.5 and a C99 Extension
Full Version: 8.5 and a C99 Extension
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

gs

03-10-2006, 01:26 PM
Hi,
I use 'inline' within my code. Not wanting to go into any details, let us just suffice it to say I feel sufficient reason exists for me to do so. Does 8.5 apply to inline functions? Does the use of 'inline' supercede the restriction of 0 function definitions per header?

misra-c

21-11-2006, 03:10 PM
MISRA-C Steering Meeting - 7th November 2006

MISRA-C:2004 will require
(a) deviation against 1.1 for the use of an extension to C90, and
(b) deviation against 8.5 for the definitions in each header file.
MISRA Discussion Forums > MISRA C > MISRA-C: 2004 rules > 6.8 Declarations and Definitions > 8.5 and a C99 Extension