MISRA Discussion Forums

MISRA Discussion Forums > MISRA C++ > MISRA C++:2008 rules > 6.17 Library introduction (C++) > Should #17-0-2 include any non-function identifier?
Full Version: Should #17-0-2 include any non-function identifier?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

gs

16-03-2010, 02:11 PM
A discussion of a similar rule for MISRA C concluded the rule was meant to encompass any reserved identifier. While MISRA C++ has excluded functions from this rule and placed their consideration under rule #17-0-3, no mention of standard types (e.g, clock_t) or any other non-function identifier is made as far as I can tell. Should the rule include these also?

misra cpp

07-10-2015, 08:59 AM
The changes to the wording in MISRA C will be reviewed for inclusion in a future version of MISRA C++.
MISRA Discussion Forums > MISRA C++ > MISRA C++:2008 rules > 6.17 Library introduction (C++) > Should #17-0-2 include any non-function identifier?