+- MISRA Discussion Forums (https://forum.misra.org.uk)
+-- Forum: MISRA C (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: MISRA C:2012 and MISRA C:2023 guidelines (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=21)
+---- Forum: 7.2 Compilation and build (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=179)
+---- Thread: 2.4 violation? (/showthread.php?tid=1023)
2.4 violation? - gs - 28-01-2014
Does the following example violate rule #2.4:
Code:
typedef enum A {
b
} A;
A c() {
return b;
}Re: 2.4 violation? - misra-c - 10-02-2014
Your example does violate rule 2.4, providing typedef “A†is always used in the rest of the translation unit and never “enum Aâ€. A compliant typedef declaration could be written as
Code:
typedef enum {
b
} A;