A question for Rule21.8 - Printable Version +- MISRA Discussion Forums (https://forum.misra.org.uk) +-- Forum: MISRA C (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: MISRA C:2012 and MISRA C:2023 guidelines (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=21) +---- Forum: 8.21 Standard libraries (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=176) +---- Thread: A question for Rule21.8 (/showthread.php?tid=1076) |
A question for Rule21.8 - tsukukazu - 14-07-2014 Hello. I have a question about rule 21.8. _Exit Function that were added in C99 also has implementation-defined behavior. Is this not included? Best regards, Kazuhiro Tsukushiro Re: A question for Rule21.8 - misra-c - 11-08-2014 It was a conscious decision not to include _Exit in this rule. _Exit() differs from exit() in that no atexit-registered handlers are called prior to program termination. This means that the undefined behaviour that can occur with exit() isn't possible with _Exit(). The implementation-defined behaviour remains a possibility (e.g. the status code returned to the environment, whether temporary files are deleted or not, whether streams are flushed and/or closed) but this was considered not to be a strong enough reason to ban _Exit(). RE: A question for Rule21.8 - misra-c - 02-07-2024 Subsequent to the previous answer, MISRA C:2012 Amendment 3 added _Exit() to Rule 21.8 |