MISRA Discussion Forums
8.3 and parameter name omitted. - Printable Version

+- MISRA Discussion Forums (https://forum.misra.org.uk)
+-- Forum: MISRA C (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: MISRA C:2012 and MISRA C:2023 guidelines (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=21)
+---- Forum: 8.8 Declarations and defnitions (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=163)
+---- Thread: 8.3 and parameter name omitted. (/showthread.php?tid=1192)



8.3 and parameter name omitted. - lovewar - 01-07-2015

Would the following examples be compliant with rule #8.3?
Code:
-- in t1.h
extern int foo(int);

-- t2.c
#include "t1.h"

int foo(int value) {  // here(parameter name do not match)
}



Re: 8.3 and parameter name omitted. - misra-c - 05-08-2015

The extern declaration of foo is not compliant with rule 8.2, which requires function declarations to have named parameters.

The MISRA-C working group is currently considering whether rule 8.3 includes the case where the declaration has no parameter name and definition does have a parameter name.


RE: 8.3 and parameter name omitted. - misra-c - 02-07-2024

Clarification of R.8.2 was added in MISRA C:2012 TC2