R4-5-1 Alternative tokens - Printable Version +- MISRA Discussion Forums (https://forum.misra.org.uk) +-- Forum: MISRA C++ (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=18) +--- Forum: MISRA C++:2008 rules (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=19) +---- Forum: 6.4 Standard conversions (C++) (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=133) +---- Thread: R4-5-1 Alternative tokens (/showthread.php?tid=1579) |
R4-5-1 Alternative tokens - ELovisari - 23-09-2021 Hello, I have a request for clarification for rule 4-5-1: Quote:Rule 4–5–1 Rule 4-5-1 and its Rationale do not seem to explicitly forbid the alternative operator representations and, or and not, which, if I understand correctly, are equivalent to the allowed &&, || and !. Rule 2-5-1 explicitly forbids digraphs, but restricts the notion of digraph to the six cases given in its Rationale. Can I therefore interpret the rule as implicitly allowing and, or and not (and then maybe also not_eq) tokens? RE: R4-5-1 Alternative tokens - misra cpp - 08-10-2021 You are right that the rule implicitly allows 'and', 'or', 'not' and 'not_eq'. The C++ standard makes it clear that 'and' is simply an alternative representation of '&&' etc. This is likely to be made explicit in the next version RE: R4-5-1 Alternative tokens - ELovisari - 13-10-2021 Perfect. Thank you. RE: R4-5-1 Alternative tokens - misra cpp - 11-01-2022 This thread is now closed Anyone having a related question, .please start a new thread |