+- MISRA Discussion Forums (https://forum.misra.org.uk)
+-- Forum: MISRA C++ (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=18)
+--- Forum: AUTOSAR C++:2014 rules (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=185)
+--- Thread: Why example in Rule A5-0-2 is non-complient (/showthread.php?tid=1630)
Why example in Rule A5-0-2 is non-complient - kafka - 27-07-2022
Could someone please explain why the "if (u && (boolean1 <= boolean2));" in Rule A5-0-2 is non-compliant.
RE: Why example in Rule A5-0-2 is non-complient - misra cpp - 05-08-2022
The example above the line you quote, "if (u8)", is non-compliant because u8 is not of type bool. The rationale is that it is unclear whether the programmer recognises that (u8) is equivalent to (u8 != 0) or whether some other condition has been omitted.
The example you quote is there to illustrate that 'u8' doesn't become an acceptable Boolean value when incorporated into a more complex expression. It is arguable that the condition isn’t non-compliant with A5-0-2, as the type of the logical && expression is bool. However, It is non-compliant with M5-3-1 “Each operand of the ! operator, the logical && or logical || operators shall have the type bool”. The comment ought to say ‘compliant with this rule, but non-compliant with M5-3-1’.