Rule 4-5-3 about using relational operators to determine uint8_t - Printable Version +- MISRA Discussion Forums (https://forum.misra.org.uk) +-- Forum: MISRA C++ (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=18) +--- Forum: MISRA C++:2008 rules (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=19) +---- Forum: 6.4 Standard conversions (C++) (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=133) +---- Thread: Rule 4-5-3 about using relational operators to determine uint8_t (/showthread.php?tid=1639) |
Rule 4-5-3 about using relational operators to determine uint8_t - zhaohui - 08-12-2022 Quote:Exceptionally, the following operators may be used if the associated restriction is observed:According to exceptions and cases of Rule 4-5-3, it seems that Exp1 apples to uint8_t and Exp2, Exp3 apply to character (wide character). And the rule title mainly cares about plain char and wchar_t, so, 1. What about using uint8_t as operands of relational operators? 2. Which kind of cases does uint8_t violate this rule? Does this rule only check binary operator "+" only for uint8_t? Code: void f(void) RE: Rule 4-5-3 about using relational operators to determine uint8_t - misra cpp - 06-11-2023 The intent of the rule is to enforce the interpretation that plain chars are used for characters, whereas signed/unsigned chars are meant to represent numeric values. The exceptions exist because, at some point there is likely to be a requirement to input a string and interpret it as an integer (hence the allowed comparison with characters '0'..'9' and subtraction of '0'). Similarly, during output, converting an integer between 0..9 to a char requires adding '0'. This rule does not apply to uint8_t, as there is no ambiguity in its range - unlike plain char which may be 0..255 or -128..127 |