+- MISRA Discussion Forums (https://forum.misra.org.uk)
+-- Forum: MISRA C++ (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=18)
+--- Forum: AUTOSAR C++:2014 rules (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=185)
+--- Thread: A3-3-2 Contradictory examples? (/showthread.php?tid=1731)
A3-3-2 Contradictory examples? - cgpzs - 17-03-2025
In Rule A3-3-2, there's an example with "class A" which has a non-constexpr, user-defined constructor.
On line 31, we have a compliant example:
Code:
A instance{}; // Compliant - constant (value) initializationHowever, on line 37 it's no longer compliant:
Code:
static A a{}; // Non-compliant - A’s default c’tor is not constexprThere seems to be a contradiction here. Either the code is doing value initialization, or it's calling a constructor, but not both. Which one is it?
In other words, it seems like both examples are doing the same thing, so both should either be compliant or non-compliant. Would you agree?
RE: A3-3-2 Contradictory examples? - misra cpp - 28-03-2025
This appears to be an error, thanks for pointing it out.
Line 31 should be non-compliant, for the same reason as line 37
RE: A3-3-2 Contradictory examples? - cgpzs - 31-03-2025
(28-03-2025, 01:49 PM)misra cpp Wrote: This appears to be an error, thanks for pointing it out.
Line 31 should be non-compliant, for the same reason as line 37
I agree, thanks for the clarification!