+- MISRA Discussion Forums (https://forum.misra.org.uk)
+-- Forum: MISRA C (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: MISRA-C: 2004 rules (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+---- Forum: 6.8 Declarations and Definitions (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=35)
+---- Thread: 8.5 and a C99 Extension (/showthread.php?tid=311)
8.5 and a C99 Extension - gs - 03-10-2006
Hi,
I use 'inline' within my code. Not wanting to go into any details, let us just suffice it to say I feel sufficient reason exists for me to do so. Does 8.5 apply to inline functions? Does the use of 'inline' supercede the restriction of 0 function definitions per header?
- misra-c - 21-11-2006
MISRA-C Steering Meeting - 7th November 2006
MISRA-C:2004 will require
(a) deviation against 1.1 for the use of an extension to C90, and
(b) deviation against 8.5 for the definitions in each header file.