Clarification of 20.1 - Intrepretation of \"not to be d - Printable Version +- MISRA Discussion Forums (https://forum.misra.org.uk) +-- Forum: MISRA C (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: MISRA-C: 2004 rules (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +---- Forum: 6.20 Standard Libraries (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=42) +---- Thread: Clarification of 20.1 - Intrepretation of \"not to be d (/showthread.php?tid=38) |
Clarification of 20.1 - Intrepretation of \"not to be d - Gavin McCall - 09-09-2005 Question 2: Interpretation of \"not be defined, redefined\" a) Does it mean that \"#define\" is not allowed? b) Is it not allowed to define as an object or a function, either? Answer: MISRA C Steering Team clarification 7/9/2005 (a) YES - To define an object or a function with the name of a reserved identifier is prohibited under rule 20.2. (b) YES - To #define macros with the name of a reserved identifier is prohibited. |