MISRA Discussion Forums › MISRA C › MISRA C:2012 and MISRA C:2023 guidelines › 8.2 Unused code
Rule 2.5 vs. include guards

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rule 2.5 vs. include guards
misra-c Offline
Senior Member
****
Posts: 605
Threads: 18
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation: 1
#2
30-03-2017, 08:01 AM
Your example is compliant with rule 2.5. The #ifndef HEADER_H is considered to be a use of the macro name, even though it appears before the #define.
Posted by and on behalf of the MISRA C Working Group
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)