<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[MISRA Discussion Forums - 7.1 The implementation]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.misra.org.uk/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[MISRA Discussion Forums - https://forum.misra.org.uk]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 13:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RTE call]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.misra.org.uk/showthread.php?tid=1603</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.misra.org.uk/member.php?action=profile&uid=5847">kprzygoda</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.misra.org.uk/showthread.php?tid=1603</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi All, I am calling RTE functions using microsar sip tools from vector and getting MISRA C 2012 rules violation:<br />
1) The expression (vspSoundActivation_temp = Rte_CtApNvmWrapper_NV_VSPCfgParameters.VSP_SOUNDACTIVATIONTEMP_CF) , 0 uses the comma operator<br />
2) The value returned by the assignment operator in vspSoundActivation_temp = Rte_CtApNvmWrapper_NV_VSPCfgParameters.VSP_SOUNDACTIVATIONTEMP_CF is being used<br />
<br />
Is there any clear way of get rid of the messages?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi All, I am calling RTE functions using microsar sip tools from vector and getting MISRA C 2012 rules violation:<br />
1) The expression (vspSoundActivation_temp = Rte_CtApNvmWrapper_NV_VSPCfgParameters.VSP_SOUNDACTIVATIONTEMP_CF) , 0 uses the comma operator<br />
2) The value returned by the assignment operator in vspSoundActivation_temp = Rte_CtApNvmWrapper_NV_VSPCfgParameters.VSP_SOUNDACTIVATIONTEMP_CF is being used<br />
<br />
Is there any clear way of get rid of the messages?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[unused enum constant]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.misra.org.uk/showthread.php?tid=1602</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.misra.org.uk/member.php?action=profile&uid=5847">kprzygoda</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.misra.org.uk/showthread.php?tid=1602</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I have created enum constant and using it only for assigment to uint8_t or if comparison of uint8_t to this constant, coverity from synopsys configured for MISRA C 2012 is generating rule violation: Type has tag xxxx_enum but that tag is never used. Is there any clear way of get rid of this message?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have created enum constant and using it only for assigment to uint8_t or if comparison of uint8_t to this constant, coverity from synopsys configured for MISRA C 2012 is generating rule violation: Type has tag xxxx_enum but that tag is never used. Is there any clear way of get rid of this message?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MISRA C:2012 and ISO/IEC 9899:2011 (C11)]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.misra.org.uk/showthread.php?tid=1286</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 12:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.misra.org.uk/member.php?action=profile&uid=2627">andream</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.misra.org.uk/showthread.php?tid=1286</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[MISRA C:2012 has made reference to ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (C99). As of 2011, there is the latest ISO/IEC 9899:2011 (C11). I wonder if any Supplement, Amendment or slight change has been prepared in this respect. Or MISRA C:2012 is invariant w.r.t said latest ISO standard?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[MISRA C:2012 has made reference to ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (C99). As of 2011, there is the latest ISO/IEC 9899:2011 (C11). I wonder if any Supplement, Amendment or slight change has been prepared in this respect. Or MISRA C:2012 is invariant w.r.t said latest ISO standard?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MISRA C:2012 has no explicit library-specific restriction on <stdarg.h>?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.misra.org.uk/showthread.php?tid=1283</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.misra.org.uk/member.php?action=profile&uid=4569">bycho</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.misra.org.uk/showthread.php?tid=1283</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[A presentation slide from Andrew Banks, Chairman of MISRA C Working Group,  says <br />
that MISRA C:2012 has no explicit library-specific restriction on 7 standard headers and among these  is included.<br />
(page 13, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2035.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/w.../n2035.pdf</a>)<br />
so I thought I would be able to check whether a program is a conforming freestanding program or not by applying MISRA C:2012 guidelines.<br />
<br />
However, in MISRA C:2012 Rule 17.1 says the features of  shall not be used.<br />
<br />
I think some rules of MISRA C:2012 are too restrictive to use in various kinds of industries.<br />
Moreover, it makes me unhappy that complying with MISRA C:2012 doesn't imply conforming freestanding implementation.<br />
<br />
is the slide wrong? or is there any mistake in my mind? <br />
I'm beginner in MISRA guidelines, so I might have lots of errors.<br />
I will appreciate your advices and help.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A presentation slide from Andrew Banks, Chairman of MISRA C Working Group,  says <br />
that MISRA C:2012 has no explicit library-specific restriction on 7 standard headers and among these  is included.<br />
(page 13, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2035.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/w.../n2035.pdf</a>)<br />
so I thought I would be able to check whether a program is a conforming freestanding program or not by applying MISRA C:2012 guidelines.<br />
<br />
However, in MISRA C:2012 Rule 17.1 says the features of  shall not be used.<br />
<br />
I think some rules of MISRA C:2012 are too restrictive to use in various kinds of industries.<br />
Moreover, it makes me unhappy that complying with MISRA C:2012 doesn't imply conforming freestanding implementation.<br />
<br />
is the slide wrong? or is there any mistake in my mind? <br />
I'm beginner in MISRA guidelines, so I might have lots of errors.<br />
I will appreciate your advices and help.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>