<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[MISRA Discussion Forums - 4.4 General principles]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.misra.org.uk/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[MISRA Discussion Forums - https://forum.misra.org.uk]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 13:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[4.1.1 Can MISRA C++:2023 be used with C++14 code?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.misra.org.uk/showthread.php?tid=1760</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 10:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://forum.misra.org.uk/member.php?action=profile&uid=5614">cgpzs</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.misra.org.uk/showthread.php?tid=1760</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Rule 4.1.1 says code must comply with ISO C++ 17. Does this mean the code "must" be compiled with the -std=c++17 flag? Is there otherwise a good way to use MISRA C++:2023 on C++14 code (-std=c++14)? The motivation is to drop the AUTOSAR C++14 guidelines (which have been deprecated) and move to the more modern guidelines, while still keeping the standard used for compilation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Rule 4.1.1 says code must comply with ISO C++ 17. Does this mean the code "must" be compiled with the -std=c++17 flag? Is there otherwise a good way to use MISRA C++:2023 on C++14 code (-std=c++14)? The motivation is to drop the AUTOSAR C++14 guidelines (which have been deprecated) and move to the more modern guidelines, while still keeping the standard used for compilation.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>