Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rule 0-1-3/0-1-4/0-1-5 and (template) class members
Do these rules apply to class members?

If so, do they apply to instances of template class members?

class C {
    T member1; // never used; compliant with 0-1-3?
    T member2; // C::member2 is used but C::member2 is not; compliant with 0-1-3?

    typedef T Unused; // typedef never used: non-compliant with 0-1-5.
    typedef T X; // C::X is used but C::X is not; compliant with 0-1-5?

    void call() { // only instantiated for C

int main() {

The same question also applies to 0-1-4.

For 0-1-10 the situation is different, as class template member functions only get instantiated if they actually used. Thus C::call() is compliant with 0-1-10. A completely unused class template member function would be non-compliant with Rule 14-7-1.
The basic answer to all these queries is that every definition in the program must be used somewhere, or conversely, it should not be possible to remove a definition from the code and still have the program compile.

So for a template class, each member of the class must be used by at least one instantiation of the template.
Posted by and on behalf of
the MISRA C++ Working Group

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)