+- MISRA Discussion Forums (https://forum.misra.org.uk)
+-- Forum: MISRA C++ (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=18)
+--- Forum: MISRA C++:2008 rules (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+---- Forum: 6.17 Library introduction (C++) (https://forum.misra.org.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=145)
+---- Thread: Should #17-0-2 include any non-function identifier? (/showthread.php?tid=717)
Should #17-0-2 include any non-function identifier? - gs - 16-03-2010
A discussion of a similar rule for MISRA C concluded the rule was meant to encompass any reserved identifier. While MISRA C++ has excluded functions from this rule and placed their consideration under rule #17-0-3, no mention of standard types (e.g, clock_t) or any other non-function identifier is made as far as I can tell. Should the rule include these also?
Re: Should #17-0-2 include any non-function identifier? - misra cpp - 07-10-2015
The changes to the wording in MISRA C will be reviewed for inclusion in a future version of MISRA C++.