Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should #17-0-2 include any non-function identifier?
#1
A discussion of a similar rule for MISRA C concluded the rule was meant to encompass any reserved identifier. While MISRA C++ has excluded functions from this rule and placed their consideration under rule #17-0-3, no mention of standard types (e.g, clock_t) or any other non-function identifier is made as far as I can tell. Should the rule include these also?
Reply
#2
The changes to the wording in MISRA C will be reviewed for inclusion in a future version of MISRA C++.
Posted by and on behalf of
the MISRA C++ Working Group
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)