15-09-2011, 05:55 PM
Is this permissible under rule 19.14?
JohnC.
Code:
#define X ((defined(Y)) || (defined(Z)))
#if X
...
#endif
JohnC.
<t></t>
Welcome to the new MISRA discussion forum, if you were previously a member of our forums you may need to reset your password.
Rule 19.14 - multiple defines
|
15-09-2011, 05:55 PM
Is this permissible under rule 19.14?
Code: #define X ((defined(Y)) || (defined(Z))) JohnC.
<t></t>
21-09-2011, 09:12 AM
The defined operator is being used in one of the two standard forms. However, the normative text that accompanies the rule also states that generation of the token "defined" during expansion of #if or #elif leads to undefined behaviour [C90 Undefined 47] and shall therefore be avoided. It also provides an example of this.
Therefore, the code fragment is not permissible under Rule 19.14.
Posted by and on behalf of the MISRA C Working Group
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|