Macros with not distinct parameters names: raise rule 5.4?

[ggoulas]

Hi,

Should the following raise MISRA C:2012 rule 5.4 ?

#define MACRO(MACRO) MACRO

and more generally:
#define X123456789_123456789_123456789_AA(X123456789_123456789_123456789_AB) f(X123456789_123456789_123456789_AB)

I thought that not since there is no confusion when parameters are substituted because the macro is not active.
Is it right?
Many thanks!

[misra-c]

Your example is compliant with rule 5.4. This rule only requires that the macro being defined has a name that is distinct from

• the names of other macros that are currently defined
  
• the names of macro parameters in other macros that are currently defined.