Rule 16.9 - Error in code example

[William Forbes]

The code in the normative text of rule 16.9 is:

Code:

if (f)     /* not compliant - gives a constant non-zero value which is
{             the address of f - use either f() or &f */
    /* ... */
}

Maybe it should be:

Code:

if (f)     /* not compliant - gives a constant non-zero value which is
              the address of f - use either f() or &f */
{
    /* ... */
}

Note - the opening brace was inside the comment.
A trivial error but maybe it should get corrected?