Rule 15.2: MISRA warning is not generated

[vastrad]

The section at the beginning of the section 6.15 is considered normative and is known by Rule 15.0.
Here, I think you'll find that your example breaks the rule for the syntax of a "case-clause".
Note that the only legal terminating token sequences are

Code:

break ;

or

Code:

break ; }

Your example has

Code:

break ; } }

and thus does not comply (with Rule 15.0).

If we understand the reply as "Whatever be the number of paths we traverse within a case statement, finally the case statement should end with an explicit break. It is not acceptable to have three break statements from three different paths", then should we not get a MISRA warning when we write a break statement within an if/else block?