Initialization of the form { 0 } in relation to Rule 11.9

[rgamble]

Is the following example intended to be a violation of Rule 11.9?

Code:

#include

void f(void) {
    uint16_t * var[10] = { 0 };  // violates 11.9?
}

While a strict interpretation seems to suggest this a technically a violation, Rule 9.2 specifically allows for an initializer of the form { 0 } which indicates that this (being a violation of 11.9) may not have been intended.