05-01-2006, 04:48 PM
ANSWER: MISRA-C Steering Team 5/1/06
Your example is not compliant with 17.4.
Tab is an array type, therefore rule 17.1 is met. Rules 17.1, 17.2 and 17.3 address undefined behaviour issues.
It is recognised that 17.4 is a more restrictive rule than 17.1. Rule 17.1 still applies when rule 17.4 is deviated.
Use either
A deviation to rule 17.4 would need to be raised for direct pointer arithmetic on arrays as in your example above.
Your example is not compliant with 17.4.
Tab is an array type, therefore rule 17.1 is met. Rules 17.1, 17.2 and 17.3 address undefined behaviour issues.
It is recognised that 17.4 is a more restrictive rule than 17.1. Rule 17.1 still applies when rule 17.4 is deviated.
Use either
Code:
tab[2] = 33;
tab[3] = 11;
tab[i+2] = …;A deviation to rule 17.4 would need to be raised for direct pointer arithmetic on arrays as in your example above.