21-12-2016, 10:50 AM
The rule's title includes "types", but the body of the rule does not specify further whether this is meant for typedefs only, or for complex classes as well.
For example, a class only used in a single function: should it be moved into the function? That would work against the typical ideas of short functions and separation of responsibilities. Could you please clarify MISRA's intention here?
For example, a class only used in a single function: should it be moved into the function? That would work against the typical ideas of short functions and separation of responsibilities. Could you please clarify MISRA's intention here?
<t></t>