Welcome to the new MISRA discussion forum, if you were previously a member of our forums you may need to reset your password.
Rule 0.1.9 - is zero-initialization considered "dead code"?
|
Rule 0.1.9 - is zero-initialization considered "dead code"?
|
27-09-2024, 12:51 PM
Strictly this does not violate 0.1.9, because the statement that declares f cannot be removed and still leave working code, but it may be seen as zero initialising followed by assignment (i.e. the zero initialisation is redundant) which violates 0.1.6.
Posted by and on behalf of
the MISRA C++ Working Group |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Rule 0.1.9 - is zero-initialization considered "dead code"? - by cgpzs - 25-09-2024, 07:22 AM
RE: Rule 0.1.9 - is zero-initialization considered "dead code"? - by misra cpp - 27-09-2024, 12:51 PM
RE: Rule 0.1.9 - is zero-initialization considered "dead code"? - by cgpzs - 27-09-2024, 05:49 PM
RE: Rule 0.1.9 - is zero-initialization considered "dead code"? - by misra cpp - 11-10-2024, 02:46 PM
|
