Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
16.6.1 clarification
#3
(28-03-2025, 02:17 PM)misra cpp Wrote: The aim of this rule is not to force symmetry. As you point out, this may not be required.

The aim is to limit interactions between the intended behaviour and the possibility of implicit conversions, so either of your approaches may be appropriate, depending upon the required behaviour.

Understood, thanks for the quick response!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
16.6.1 clarification - by cgpzs - 26-03-2025, 02:36 PM
RE: 16.6.1 clarification - by misra cpp - 28-03-2025, 02:17 PM
RE: 16.6.1 clarification - by cgpzs - 31-03-2025, 09:29 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)