06-06-2025, 03:22 PM
Unfortunately, for this example the wording in MISRA C++::2008 6-6-1 is ambiguous.
As you can see from the example from MISRA C++::2023 9.6.2, our intension is that this should be non-compliant. Indeed the rewording from 6-6-1 to 9.6.2 is to remove this ambiguity
As you can see from the example from MISRA C++::2023 9.6.2, our intension is that this should be non-compliant. Indeed the rewording from 6-6-1 to 9.6.2 is to remove this ambiguity
Posted by and on behalf of
the MISRA C++ Working Group
the MISRA C++ Working Group