Clarification Rule 0.2.1

[misra cpp]

You're right, the intent of 0.2.1 was that 'd' in you example should be compliant, but a strict reading of the rule says its not.

The problem is the last paragraph in the rule:  "The variable is of class type and has a user-provided constructor or a user-provided destructor.".  The two occurrences of  'user-provided'  should be  'non-trivial'.  This has been noted for future revision.

In the short term, you can either deviate or provide an explicit constructor for Devired.