Welcome to the new MISRA discussion forum, if you were previously a member of our forums you may need to reset your password.
Underlying Type Presumptions
|
Underlying Type Presumptions
|
19-09-2005, 03:19 PM
If „effectively Boolean expressions have underlying type of int“ (implicit signed int without u?) this potentially conflicts with rule 6.4 and 10.1? It’s no longer possible to have a single bit flag or semaphore (TRUE/FALSE) in a bit field? Is this intended or did I misunderstand this?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
