MISRA Discussion Forums › MISRA C › MISRA-C: 2004 rules › 6.16 Functions
Is 16.4 violated if 16.3 is?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is 16.4 violated if 16.3 is?
misra-c Offline
Senior Member
****
Posts: 605
Threads: 18
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation: 1
#2
16-10-2012, 04:48 PM
No is doesn't really make sense to flag a violation of both rules in this case. Therefore, to violate Rule 16.4, both identifiers need to be present, but different.
Posted by and on behalf of the MISRA C Working Group
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)