Rationale for 11.9 -- NULL constant

[stephen.parker]

Can anyone explain what the rationale is for this rule? I could think of several arguments for why you shouldn't use NULL, and should prefer a plain 0 (as is generally preferred in C++). This feels like a stylistic issue.

Thanks,
stephen

[misra-c]

The standard (ISO 9899:1999 6.3.2.3) defines a null pointer constant:

An integral constant expression with the value 0 , or such an expression cast to type void *, is called a null pointer constant.

This means, for example that it is legitimate in the C language to compare a pointer expression with any form of integer constant expression including for example '\0' or any enum constant of value 0. For this reason it is advisable to use NULL wherever a null pointer constant is intended.

The semantics are subtly different in C++