23-04-2013, 09:41 AM
It seems there is a minor inconsistency in MISRA-C 2004. At top of pag. 103 (Appendix B) I can read that rule 77 in MISRA-C 1998 is mapped onto rule 10.2 in MISRA-C 2004. Indeed this latter is as duly reported in third column ("The value of an expression of floating type..."), but corresponding rule 77 in MISRA C 1998 is well different:
"The unqualifed type of parameters passed to a function shall be compatible with the unqualified expected types defined in the function prototype".
Can you help me?
"The unqualifed type of parameters passed to a function shall be compatible with the unqualified expected types defined in the function prototype".
Can you help me?
<t></t>