Posts: 632
Threads: 18
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation:
1
Rule 2.5 Is #undef considered a “use†of a macro�
For example
Code:
#define M1 This
#define M2 That
#undef M1
use( M2 );
Is 'M1' unused and therefore violate rule 2.5, or does the #undef count as a use of M1?
Posted by and on behalf of the MISRA C Working Group
Posts: 632
Threads: 18
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation:
1
Similarly:
Code:
#define M3 first
#undef M3
#define M3 second
use( M3 );
Is the first #define of M3 unused?
Posted by and on behalf of the MISRA C Working Group
Posts: 632
Threads: 18
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation:
1
#undef is considered to be a use of the macro. There are no violations of rule 2.5 in these examples
Posted by and on behalf of the MISRA C Working Group
Posts: 9
Threads: 6
Joined: Apr 2017
Reputation:
0
Rule 2.5 Is #undef considered a “use†of a macro�
For example
CODE: SELECT ALL
#define M1 This
#define M2 That
#undef M1
use( M2 );
Is 'M1' unused and therefore violate rule 2.5, or does the #undef count as a use of M1?
using #undef is a violation for Rule 20.5. #undef used is not appreciated for MISRA C 2012. so, For me, #undef count can not be recognized as a use of M1? the above code should is a violation for rule 2.5.
<t></t>