Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rule 2.5 Does #undef count as a "use"
#1
Rule 2.5 Is #undef considered a “use” of a macro”?
For example
Code:
#define M1 This
   #define M2 That
   #undef M1
   use( M2 );
Is 'M1' unused and therefore violate rule 2.5, or does the #undef count as a use of M1?
Posted by and on behalf of the MISRA C Working Group
#2
Similarly:
Code:
#define M3 first
   #undef M3
   #define M3 second
   use( M3 );
Is the first #define of M3 unused?
Posted by and on behalf of the MISRA C Working Group
#3
#undef is considered to be a use of the macro. There are no violations of rule 2.5 in these examples
Posted by and on behalf of the MISRA C Working Group
#4
Rule 2.5 Is #undef considered a “use” of a macro”?
For example
CODE: SELECT ALL
#define M1 This
#define M2 That
#undef M1
use( M2 );

Is 'M1' unused and therefore violate rule 2.5, or does the #undef count as a use of M1?

using #undef is a violation for Rule 20.5. #undef used is not appreciated for MISRA C 2012. so, For me, #undef count can not be recognized as a use of M1? the above code should is a violation for rule 2.5.
<t></t>


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)