19-12-2017, 07:13 AM
Hi,
I was just reading this article about the Toyota incident (http://www.safetyresearch.net/Library/Ba...RUBBED.pdf) and was wondering why this rule is advisory compared to MISRA C 2004 and MISRA C 2012?
I was just reading this article about the Toyota incident (http://www.safetyresearch.net/Library/Ba...RUBBED.pdf) and was wondering why this rule is advisory compared to MISRA C 2004 and MISRA C 2012?
<t></t>