08-10-2021, 11:24 AM
You are right that the rule implicitly allows 'and', 'or', 'not' and 'not_eq'. The C++ standard makes it clear that 'and' is simply an alternative representation of '&&' etc.
This is likely to be made explicit in the next version
This is likely to be made explicit in the next version
Posted by and on behalf of
the MISRA C++ Working Group
the MISRA C++ Working Group